In 2025, 6% of consumers asked AI to recommend a local business. This year it is 45%. Reputation has always been about being talked about. Now it is about being talked about by a machine, and then being checked up on by the human who asked it.
That second step is the part nobody is preparing for. According to BrightLocal's 2026 research, 97% of people who use AI for business recommendations still double-check them against real reviews. Being named is the first interview. Your reputation faces a second one, and this time the panel is sceptical.
The survey covered 1,002 US consumers, but there is little reason to think British customers behave differently when the same tools sit in the same pockets.
1. A recommendation is a claim, not a verdict
Among AI users, 63% trust what the tools tell them. That sounds like a win for anyone who gets named. But trust and reliance are different things. Eighty-eight per cent of those users also fact-check the sources the AI cites.
People have learned that a confident answer can be wrong. So the AI's mention does one job: it puts you in the room. What happens next depends on whether your reputation survives being looked at properly.
2. Reviews are still the currency of belief
Only 40% of consumers trust AI platforms for business recommendations. Forty-nine per cent trust online reviews as much as a personal recommendation from someone they know.
That gap explains the behaviour. When the stakes are real, whether it is someone who will be in your house, near your children or handling your money, people reach for the evidence written by other customers. The machine is a signpost. The reviews are the testimony.
3. What the second interview is looking for
| What consumers told BrightLocal in 2026 | Share |
|---|---|
| Use AI tools for local business recommendations | 45% (6% in 2025) |
| Trust online reviews as much as a personal recommendation | 49% |
| Trust AI platforms for business recommendations | 40% |
| AI users who double-check against reviews on native platforms | 97% |
| Deterred by negative reviews | 77% |
| Won’t use a business that never responds to feedback | 42% |
| View generic or templated replies negatively | 50% |
Source: BrightLocal Local Consumer Review Survey 2026 and AI trust study, both based on 1,002 US adult consumers.
Read down the right-hand column and a pattern appears. Customers are not hunting for perfection. They are hunting for signs of character: how a business behaves when something goes wrong.
- Seventy-seven per cent are deterred by negative reviews, so the complaints get read.
- Forty-two per cent will not use a business that never responds, so silence is read as an answer.
- Half view generic, copy-and-paste replies negatively, so a response that sounds like it came from a script is read as indifference.
4. Silence has a price
This is where small businesses lose without knowing it. The owner who never replies is not being neutral. They are telling every future customer, in public, that complaints go nowhere.
The quiet cost
Nobody sends a message saying they chose the competitor because your last three complaints were left hanging. They simply read the page, decide, and move on. The AI got you into the room. Your reputation, as it appears at that moment, shut the door.
The reverse is equally true. A thoughtful reply to a bad review is one of the few chances a small firm gets to show its character to people who have not yet bought anything.
5. Treat your reputation as something that will be cross-examined
- Read your reviews as a stranger would, in the order a stranger would, starting with the worst.
- Answer complaints specifically: name the job, the date, the fix. Avoid anything that could be pasted under any review.
- Search for your own business in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, then check that what they say matches what your reviews say.
The takeaway
For years, reputation was something that happened to a business. In an AI-introduced market it is something a business has to be ready to defend, every time a customer is sent its way.
If a stranger came to you through ChatGPT this morning and spent a minute reading about you before deciding, what would they have found?
Read next